top of page

The Fear of Losing Parents Who Are Perfectly Fine: Understanding Anticipatory Grief

3 days ago
8 min read

LONITÉ Editorial Team



Anticipatory grief does not wait for a diagnosis. Why the thought refuses to finish, why worrying now does not make it hurt less later, and what helps instead.


There is a kind of fear that does not arrive with bad news.


It arrives in small observations about your parents. They say "at my age" for the first time. They have started holding the handrail. They stop proposing the hiking route, the one that used to be a tradition.


You notice marks on their hands that were not there before, then catch yourself looking at your own. The television is louder than you keep it. In restaurants they say less than they used to, and laugh a beat behind everyone else.


Nothing is wrong, and nothing has happened, yet you find yourself doing arithmetic, taking a parent's age, setting it against an average life expectancy, and stopping the sum before it gives you a number.




What is anticipatory grief?


Anticipatory grief is mourning that begins before a death rather than after it. Clinically, the term is used for families facing a terminal diagnosis, but the experience does not wait for one. It can begin the first time you register that your parents are getting older.


Nearly everything published on anticipatory grief addresses people whose parent is already ill, and there is much less for the ones whose parents are perfectly healthy and who feel faintly ridiculous about mourning someone currently out in the garden.


It counts anyway. Parents are older than they were, and some part of the mind has already begun to brace.


Bracing is what love does when it notices time.



"I cannot imagine a world without them"


This fear has more to do with a thought you cannot finish than with funerals. The thought travels a certain distance, arrives at a world where that person does not exist, and cannot be held there for more than a second before the mind puts it down.


There is a reason it stops there.


Everyone carries a set of assumptions. Certain people exist, certain things are reliably there, and the world has a particular shape. Bereavement researchers call this the assumptive world. A parent is usually load-bearing inside it. So picturing their absence means picturing the frame itself giving way, and the mind declines.


You never learn how much of your world rests on them until you try to imagine it without them.



"I could not survive it"


The second thought is a prediction rather than an image, and the one human beings are worst at making.


You are not a reliable witness to your own future. When asked how they will feel after something terrible, people tend to overestimate how bad the pain will be and how long it lasts. What the forecast misses is the ordinary work a mind does to soften a painful thing, which cannot be felt before it begins.


Even though losing a parent is never easy to survive, the loss you picture leaves out the people who will be in the room, and the resilience you do not know you have.



"At least I am preparing myself"


The instinctive belief is that rehearsing the loss pays it down in installments, so the bill will be smaller when it comes. Research on anticipatory grief does not support this. Some of it points the other way, with adult children who anticipated the death most adjusting worse afterwards.


Rehearsal is not preparation. It charges for the performance twice.



Your parents are probably less frightened than you are


When death anxiety is measured in older adults alongside their adult children, the children consistently score higher. They also misjudge their parents, assuming a distress that often is not there.


Older people have generally had more time to sit with mortality. Many have buried their own parents, and some have buried friends. A parent who has made peace with it, and whose children steer around the subject anyway, is being protected from a conversation they were willing to have.



Making room for the sorrow


Knowing why the fear works the way it does will not stop it from arriving. Sorrow that turns up years early feels like a fault to be corrected, and most people meet it by trying to think their way out.


Acceptance is the word for what works instead: letting the sorrow be present without fighting it, which asks nothing about approving of the loss or being ready for it. A wave you do not fight rises, sits for a while, and settles. Push against one and it slams into you, gathers, comes again, and wears you out. The quiet comes from moving with the water rather than standing against it.


Thich Nhat Hanh spent much of his life on how one thing becomes another, and put the idea in an image. "You would not cry if you knew that by looking deeply into the rain you would still see the cloud."


A cloud becomes rain, and the rain becomes the tea in your cup, so the thing you went looking for in the sky is sitting in your hands.


That transfer has been running your whole life and is running now. Their gestures are already in your hands. Their phrasing turns up in your sentences when you are tired. People who will never meet them will meet something of them in you. What you are afraid of losing has already begun moving into you.




How to start the conversation


Not knowing is part of what the fear is made of, and it is the part you can settle now. What your parents want, and where things are kept, is easiest to learn while nothing is wrong. Bringing it up can feel like inviting something in, but the parent on the other end has usually been thinking about it for years, so there is nothing to introduce. What tends to go wrong is the timing and the wording.


Take the opening when it comes. Asking a healthy parent what they want for their own funeral lands like an accusation. Families rarely start this from nothing. The subject arrives on its own, when someone they knew passes, and the family ends up talking about how it was handled. Most people have firm opinions about a service they sat through, or about how another family managed it, and those opinions are the real answer.


Let them be practical. Many older people are relieved to talk logistics. Where the documents are. Whether there is a will, which a great many adults still do not have.


Do not attempt it all at once. This is a subject that can be reopened over years, in cars and kitchens, in ten-minute pieces.


Ask what they want kept. Most families skip this, and it is often what matters most later. Some parents want to be buried near their own. Some want to be scattered somewhere particular. Others want their family to keep something close, whether that is a portion of the ashes, cremation jewelry, or a memorial diamond made from them. A parent who has never heard of an option cannot tell you they would have wanted it.


Then let it drop and talk about something else.




What to gather while they are still here


The most useful thing to do with this fear is turn it into a project.


In palliative care, there is a short intervention where someone is interviewed about their life, what mattered, what they were proud of, what they hope will be remembered. The recording is edited into a document they can leave to their family. People who go through it report a stronger sense of meaning and purpose, as do the families who receive it.


None of that requires a clinician. A family with a phone and a year of ordinary visits can end up with the same thing, which is a memoir in their parent's own voice.


It goes better in pieces than in one sitting. Announcing an interview turns it into an occasion. A ten-minute answer on a drive, an hour after dinner, a walk in the park: the shape can be found later, in the edit. What matters at the start is keeping the pieces in one place rather than scattered through a camera roll where nobody will find them again.


When older people recall their lives, the memories cluster far more densely in the years between roughly ten and thirty than anywhere else, and those are the memories most tied to who they believe themselves to be. So ask about the decades before you existed. What they were like at nineteen. Who they nearly married. What their first job paid. Which of their own parents they took after, and whether they minded. Something they did that nobody would guess.


Resist the urge to talk over them, or to explain for whoever might watch it later.


Then there are the things few people think to keep.


Their hands. Film them doing something they have done ten thousand times, kneading dough, peeling an apple, signing their name. Hands are what most people find they cannot picture afterwards.




Their laugh. Catch them laughing rather than talking. The laugh is usually the first thing to go.


Their reading voice. Ask them to read a children's book aloud, and it will exist for a great-grandchild nobody has met yet.


Something they wore. A scarf, a coat, a sweater they lived in. Years from now you will put your hand in a pocket and find it worn soft in the shape of theirs.


An object does different work from a recording, which is why the scarf is worth keeping alongside the films. It takes up physical space, so it is encountered rather than searched for. It also survives neglect, where files last only as long as someone keeps copying them forward.


Some people have a diamond grown from a lock of hair, which is made from them rather than about them. LONITÉ grows both hair diamonds and memorial diamonds from ashes in its Swiss laboratories. Hair carries more carbon than ashes do, and unlike ashes, it can be given while a parent is alive. Some families treat it as a joint project or an anniversary gift, with the parent choosing the color themselves. Asking for a lock of hair is an odd request out of nowhere, so it goes better proposed openly than arranged quietly.


Whatever keepsake you end up with, the scarf or the diamond, use it. A thing you wear is with you on days you were not thinking about it.



What the fear is actually asking for


The fear asks for contact rather than reassurance: phone calls that run longer than they need to, questions asked while they can still be answered, and afternoons that are not about anything in particular.


If the fear has stopped being occasional, if it wakes you at night or sits with you on days when nothing has happened, that is worth saying out loud to a doctor or therapist. There is no threshold anyone needs to cross to deserve that help.


You stopped the sum before it gave you a number. It would not have been a true number anyway. What is actually in front of you is time in their company, still unspent.




Sources


Sinoff, G. (2017). Thanatophobia (death anxiety) in the elderly: the problem of the child's inability to assess their own parent's death anxiety state. Frontiers in Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5326787/

Smith, S. H. (2005). Anticipatory grief and psychological adjustment to grieving in middle-aged children. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16082914/

Fee, A., Hanna, J. and Hasson, F. Anticipatory grief systematic review, Cruse Bereavement Care. https://www.cruse.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Anticipatory-Grief-Systematic-Review-21.9.20.pdf

Gilbert, D., Pinel, E., Wilson, T., Blumberg, S. and Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9781405/

Parkes, C. M., on the assumptive world; Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992), Shattered Assumptions. Overview: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shattered_assumptions_theory

Chochinov et al., dignity therapy. Systematic review: BMC Palliative Care (2015). https://bmcpalliatcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12904-015-0007-1

Understanding the reminiscence bump: a systematic review. PLOS One (2018). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0208595Further reading. On why keepsakes are worth choosing deliberately, and why a bond with a parent continues rather than closes: Volkan, V. (1981), Linking Objects and Linking Phenomena; Klass, Silverman and Nickman (1996), Continuing Bonds; and the continuing bonds systematic review in Death Studies (2023). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07481187.2023.2223593

Thich Nhat Hanh, No Death, No Fear, 2002. In copyright; quoted briefly with attribution. https://plumvillage.org/books/no-death-no-fear


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page